THE FACTS ABOUT WEIGHT LOSS AND FITNESS
|
Sept 23, 2008
NOTE: You can almost pretty
much ignore everything that I've written in the section that
follows this
book review. I
will be rewriting this piece in the near future. Instead, read my
review of the book Good Calories, Bad Calories by Gary Taubes here:
This week,
Good Calories, Bad Calories will be released in paperback form. Note
that this is NOT a nutrition or diet book - it's a science book that everyone
with an interest in nutrition, weight problems, health should take a look at.
Author Gary Taubes is not trying to sell a diet program. Rather, this book
stemmed from research that he was engaged in while looking at "bad science" for
an article that he was writing for the journal,
Science.
"Good
science" occurs when an individual comes up with a theory and then tests it to
make sure that the results are accurate and reproducible. The individual then
publishes his/her findings in a manner that correctly summarizes the
experiments' conclusions. When experiments are conducted and the
published results are not what the tests demonstrated, that would be considered
"bad science" (think propaganda).
During
the course of his research into instances of "bad science," Taubes was startled
to find that many nutritional/diet studies were just that - bad science.
He then went back and examined studies of diet/nutrition, exercise, diabetes,
lipids (cholesterol), etc and learned that almost everything we've been taught
about obesity and diet is not supported by the evidence. For
example, some people have been promoting low fat diets and increased exercise as
what's best for humans to live long and healthy lives. It turns out that this is
pretty much the opposite according to the legit scientific studies. Fat is
not the evil that it's been made out to be. Instead, the culprit is sugars (and
refined carbohydrates such as white flour) and their inherent ability to
stimulate insulin production.
Insulin, as most are aware, lowers blood sugar. Most people are not aware,
however, that insulin also deposits fat in the body (including inside of the
blood vessels). This is an evolutionary thing. If you're, let's say, a
saber tooth tiger that is eating it's fresh kill. It will gorge and the excess
calories must be stored for another day because - after all - who knows just how
long it will take before it can make another kill (days or weeks)? Insulin does
this.
On a
practical basis, many people snack on sweets (soda, cakes, candy) and eat meals
that contain starches e.g. potatoes. This results in nearly
elevated insulin levels throughout the day doing what it does best - deposit fat
on the body. This is just one reason for why it's so hard for many people to
lose weight. The excellent movie,
Supersize Me,
demonstrated this nicely. Most of Spurlock's McDonald's meals included
large sodas and French fries. However, the guy who ate only the Big Mac's every
day (Big
Mac Man) did not gain weight!
High
fructose corn syrup is another culprit in our lives. While it may not
stimulate as much insulin as sucrose, it directly stimulates the liver to put
out triglycerides which screws up the good cholesterol (HDL). This leads
to heart ailments and strokes.
Taubes
also discusses the impact that sugars (et al) have on common disease states.
Just a few hundred years ago, missionaries and doctors studied native tribes in
Africa, South Pacific Islanders, and Eskimos (among many others around the
world). All consumed diets relatively high in fats and protein (and low in carbs).
Think coconuts and ocean fish, for example. None of these groups suffered from
heart disease, diabetes or any other chronic diseases. Even cancer rates
were very low. Enter their exposure to western diet through trading:
"Here. Try some of this sugar stuff. Let us show you how to make bread from this
white flour." You get the idea. Soon after, all of these populations
started to develop problems with obesity, heart disease and diabetes. The
evidence is very compelling.
Be
aware that I just over-simplified these concepts, but Taubes does a great job of
laying out what the science really says about what really works for losing
weight (cutting down sugars, refined carbs, etc) and what doesn't (dieting,
exercise). Check out the Borzoi Reader's review of the book
here. They summarize Taube's findings and even list what the science
bears out. Better yet, if you have a difficult time controlling weight,
diabetes, heart disease, etc, then pick up a copy and read/study it. I strongly
recommend it.
jpearson
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Start ignoring here:
There is no question that how we feel about ourselves
influences our behavior in everyday life and no one is more pleased to
remind us of this fact than the companies who promote all sorts of weight
loss programs on the air waves or in the print media (But looks
aren't everything - maintaining one's appropriate weight is necessary
for the maintenance of good health. Obesity is steadily making it's move
to overtake tobacco as the #1 cause of medical problems in the U.S.). To the tune of about
$40 billion a year, weight loss is a national obsession and has become a
field of rapid growth within the health industry.
But who should one believe? Given the multitude of choices that include
everything from "heart healthy" diets to "A Twinkie a day
keeps the doctor away," is it any wonder that the American public
remains confused?
Let's begin with some simple facts:
After heredity (genes), an individual's weight is largely determined
by their balance of energy (calories). In other words, weight gain or loss
depends upon the quantity of calories consumed, in comparison to the
number of calories used ("burned up"). Specifically, an
individual can gain weight by eating more or exercising less (the
"couch potato" syndrome). Sound simple enough? [Actually,
it can get a bit more complicated - we’re skipping all of the stuff
about hormones (insulin) and chemicals in the brain (serotonin) for now.]
Fun with Fat Physics!
One pound of fat is equal to approximately 3500 calories. In order to
lose this amount over the course of a week, one would have to create a
negative balance of 500 calories per day. Rather than starve ourselves,
the healthier way to achieve this goal is to increase the level of your
activity through that "dirty" word called exercise.
Why? Because our bodies are finely-tuned machines with the ability to
monitor and regulate our metabolism (use of energy). Here's an
oversimplification: Imagine a sensor in our brains, much like a
thermostat. Our bodies are constantly burning up calories for things that
we don't even think about - our heart beating, lungs breathing, occasional
walking, etc.. Let's say that a body uses up to 1500 calories/day
essentially doing nothing more than basic life functions. If this
individual takes in only 1000 calories/day, he or she would lose 500
calories/day because of this "negative" energy balance.
Unfortunately, this lasts only for the first two or three weeks because
the "sensor" realizes "Hey, this jerk is trying to starve
me - I'd better conserve energy!" The thermostat-like mechanism then
resets itself to a lower number (for example 1000 calories expended per
day for those same basic functions). The 1000 calories/day coming in now
balances the 1000 calories/day being burned up, therefore, the weight loss
slows down or stops. Therefore, you have a better chance of losing
weight if you eat throughout the day, rather than dieting, if you eat
correctly.
Also, exercise works by helping to reset that thermostat - usually to even
higher than the 1500 calories/day at baseline, let's say to 2000
calories/day. It is through this mechanism that weight loss can then be
achieved.
A healthy weight loss prescription, then, consists of two components:
the meal plan and an exercise program. Neither needs to be very
complicated in order to be effective.
Incidentally, the Wall Street Journal
recently published an excellent article, "The
Diet that Works - what science tells us about successful weight loss"
by Tara Parker-Pope (April 22, 2003). I recommend that everybody read
this piece. (If the link doesn't work, I've scanned the article here.)
Eating to Lose Weight
If you do nothing else, simply reducing your daily fat intake will
result in weight loss. Learn how to read food packaging labels. Try
substituting lower fat foods for those that you normally consume. For
example, drink 2% milk instead of whole milk; frozen yogurt instead of ice
cream; eat leaner meats; use low-calorie mayonnaise and salad dressings.
These relatively easy substitutions alone can result in a 7-15 pound
weight loss over the course of a year.
Suggestion: try to think of food only in terms as a source
of fuel for your body, rather than as a source of recreation. Eat only
when you sense your body is hungry in response to low energy stores and
not just because you’re going to a movie or to "kill time."
"Eat to live - not live to
eat!"
[Stephen Furst is an actor best
known for his obese roles in Animal House, St. Elsewhere, and Babylon 5.
He went from 320 lbs down to 170 lbs and now looks great - I listened to
him speak at the 2001 AOA (American Osteopathic Association)
meeting. Steve participated in a discussion for the American
Diabetes Association which can be found at http://www.diabetesforecastlive.com/edition1/index.html.
If you have a weight problem and about an hour of free time, I recommend listening to
this often humorous discussion on losing weight.] |
A Crash Course in Nutrition
[FYI: For an excellent and very readable
book on nutrition, I recommend checking out
Nancy Clark's Sports Nutrition Guidebook.] I also highly recommend
30 Secrets of the World's Healthiest Cuisines by Steven Jonas M.D.
and Sandra Gordon.
Carbohydrates (carbs) represent an immediate
source of energy for your body; they provide the fuel for your muscles and
other organs such as your brain. Deprivation of carbohydrates, such as
seen in persons who fast, results in easy fatigue, possibly interfering
with activities of daily living. Carbs are your body's first choice
for fuel i.e. if given a choice of several types of foods simultaneously,
your body will use the energy from carbohydrates first.
Protein is necessary for building new tissues such as muscle
fibers, after they are damaged from routine everyday use. [note: get your
protein from natural sources such as fish and poultry, rather than those
very expensive supplements sold in the health food store; the quality of
protein is usually much better and at a significantly cheaper
price!]
Fat is not used immediately by your body ,
but rather is stored for future energy reserves. In other words, fat
goes right to fat. (Actually, some is used to create needed hormones such
as estrogen and testosterone. Also, endurance athletes do use fat as fuel.)
When is a Calorie, Not a Calorie???
Not all nutrients are created equal in terms of energy value. One
gram (approximately 28 grams = one ounce) of carbohydrates is equal
to 4 calories. Protein has the same 4 calories of energy value. Fats,
on the other hand, have 9 calories for every gram - more than twice
the amount of either carbohydrates or protein.
What this means is that if you eat equal amounts of carbohydrates and
fats, for example 20 grams of each, you will gain substantially more
calories from the fat (180) than from the carbohydrates (80). [Remember
this at snack time when you're trying to decide between potato chips (high
fat) and pretzels or Graham crackers (high carbs).]
Incidentally, each gram of alcohol yields 7 calories that your
body is unable to use directly and is thus stored as fat (hence the origin
of the "beer belly").
How much fat do we need?
Opinions vary. For example, the American Heart Association (AHA)
recommends that no more than 30% of our total daily calories be derived
from fat. Even this is probably too high for most people. The Pritikin
diet, on the other hand, recommends a 10% limit. This is difficult for many
to achieve (as fat is what makes food taste so gosh darn good!).
Examples:
|
1500 calories/day |
2000calories/day |
| 30% fat limit |
450 calories |
600 calories |
| fat allowed/day |
50 grams |
66 grams |
|
|
|
| 10% fat limit |
150 calories |
200 calories |
| fat allowed/day |
16.6 grams |
22.2 grams |
Food Trivia: after 11 months,
individuals who limit their total daily fat
intake to 20 grams lose your desire for the
taste of
fat!
|
|
What about low carbohydrate diets?
They work - plain and simple, although not everyone
agrees as to the reason why. They gained much recognition in the press
following the introduction of Dr. Atkin's Diet Revolution
and Sugar Busters! books. Insulin, a hormone secreted by the
pancreas, is the touted culprit behind weight gain from carbohydrates.
In addition to it’s role
in reducing blood sugar after a meal, insulin helps to deposit fat! Simple
carbohydrates (e.g. sugars) stimulate the quickest/greatest insulin
release, whereas complex carbohydrates (e.g. grain breads, yams, etc.)
induce a slower, more measured insulin response. The rating of a
carbohydrate's ability to stimulate insulin production has been termed the
glycemic index. Foods with a high glycemic index release more insulin than
those with a lower index. For example, according to Sugar
Busters!, baked potatoes have a very high glycemic index (yet many
people consume these as part of their diets), whereas sweet potatoes
(yams) have a very low glycemic index. Hence, for weight loss purposes, it
makes more sense to consume yams over regular plain potatoes. (By the
way, the healthiest part of a baked potato is the skin which contains the
most important nutrients.)
Personally, my beliefs are along the lines as touted
by the Lean
For Life program, which was developed by doctors at UCLA more than
30 years ago and is the mainstay of the Lindora
Weight Loss Clinics. As noted earlier, our body's preference for
fuel is carbs, which is fine when I was a toothpick in high school.
However, when I wanted to lose weight, I had to find a way to force my
body to utilize my stored fat as fuel, instead. Therefore, by reducing my
dietary intake of carbohydrates, I was hoping to do this. This
is termed "ketosis." Incidentally, one of the side benefits of
maintaining your body in slight ketosis is that appetite is dampened,
making it less likely that we'll overeat.
In this program, individuals are encouraged to eat
throughout the day, generally three main meals consisting mainly of
protein with some carbs, and supplementing with protein-based snacks
whenever one is hungry. My personal favorite are the Premier
Protein 8 Bars which contain 30 grams of protein and anywhere from 1-6
grams of sugar, depending upon the flavor. I've tried a lot of different
products and, in my opinion, these taste the best. [They can be found
at many stores, but the best value is to find them at Costco
during a road show; note that Costco normally carries the regular Premier
meal supplement bars with higher amounts of sugar, not the Protein 8
Bars.)] Beef/turkey jerky, sunflower seeds, etc also work for snacks.
Also, be sure to drink lots of water throughout the day to keep your
kidneys well-hydrated. Protein contains nitrogen, like fertilizer for your
lawn. If you fail to water your lawn adequately following application of
fertilizer, you may "burn" it!
Be aware that fruits and vegetables contain many
necessary vitamins and minerals. If an individual cuts down too much on
their carb selections, they
will be at risk nutritionally. While multivitamins can provide these
lost vitamins, they do not furnish fiber and other phytonutrients (derived
from plants) that are also necessary for our
health. Getting back to the subject of glycemic indices, complex
carbohydrate containing foods tend to help out with this regard. This is
the logic behind selecting 100% whole grain bread and cereal products over plain ol' white
bread, or wild rice over white rice. So be sure to incorporate these into
your meal plan. (Click the following link to read the Patient
Care magazine education handout "Advice
from your Doctor": A Healthy Low Carbohydrate Diet.")
The jury is still out on why people lose
weight on these plans. Is there something really special about the
carb/insulin relationship? Is it ketosis? Or do these patients simply end
up eating consuming less calories overall? I suspect the latter, but
patients often require specific instructions for whatever ailment they are
treating and weight loss is no different. Asking patients to reduce the
serving sizes of the white breads,
white rice, etc. seems to make it much easier for them to make
decisions about what goes into their mouth. [My own personal addiction
is sushi. We have an all-you-can eat sushi restaurant near our office,
that I hit several times a week for lunch. I pick the fish off off the
rice, allowing me to boost the percentage of protein in my diet. When I'm
finished, my plate is covered with mounds of rice that I would have
otherwise consumed. Forget the fact that there might be something special
about carbs, I take in a lot less calories at each visit by not eating the
rice.] While I'm on the subject of excess calories, don't ever
supersize anything - Lots of calories in those sodas and French fries!
[If you haven't already seen it, rent the
highly entertaining and informative DVD of the documentary "SuperSize
Me." Then, pick up a copy of Eric Schlosser's excellent book,
Fast
Food Nation, and learn what really makes those fries and
burgers taste so great...]
|
Is Santa obese or merely overweight?
(and what’s the difference?)
 Obese
= plain and simply means too much fat! (e.g.
20% above ideal body weight)
Overweight
= weighs more than would be expected for height. Fails to
consider muscle mass. e.g. Arnold Schwarzeneggar weighs more than the
typical male, but mostly due to muscle!
|
Fat content of common foods and snacks
|
FOOD |
Serving Size |
Total fat
(grams) |
|
whole milk |
1 cup |
8 |
|
2% milk |
1 cup |
4.7 |
|
cottage cheese (low fat) |
4 oz |
2 |
|
American cheese |
1 oz |
8.9 |
|
hot dog (beef) |
1 |
14.3 |
|
hot dog (turkey) |
1 |
8.9 |
|
potato chips |
1 oz |
10 |
|
pretzels |
1 oz |
1 |
|
butter |
1 Tbsp. |
11 |
|
margarine (vegetable oil) |
1 Tbsp. |
11 |
|
McDonald’s Big Mac |
1 |
34.5 |
|
How to read a food label

|
|

|
Burning up the fat!
The "E" Word
Exercise, for our purposes, refers to anything that you enjoy doing,
that makes your heart go fast (i.e. aerobics). These activities can
include running, swimming, cycling, racquet sports, etc. for those so
inclined, or fast (race) walking for persons concerned about trauma to
their joints. If running/jogging, be sure to wear good shock absorbing
shoes!
Intensity of Exercise
The good news is that it doesn’t require much intensity for
your body to burn fat as fuel. While sprinting (and other
activities that encourage short bursts of energy) use stored
glycogen/sugar for fuel, slower endurance activities, such as jogging,
burn free fatty acids as fuel.
Therefore, you don't have to "kill yourself" in order to lose or
maintain a healthy weight.
Low to moderate intensity exercise is all
that's required. The simplified formula for
calculating your target heart rate is as follows:
HRmax = 220 - age
[HRmax refers to your maximum heart rate.]
HRmax × 0.60 = target heart rate for
low intensity exercise
HRmax × 0.80 = target heart rate for
moderate intensity exercise
e.g. 50 year old starting a low intensity program would aim to maintain
a target heart rate (pulse) of 102 beats per minute.
That being said, I dislike formulas. Instead,
aim to exercise with enough intensity so that you can talk, but not
sing.
Frequency of Exercise
The American College of Sports Medicine guidelines state that the
minimum amount of time required to achieve fitness benefits per week is
about 90 minutes. For most people, 30 minutes 3 times a week or 20 minutes
daily should be relatively easy to accommodate. Start out easy and,
ideally, try to work up to 30 - 45 minutes of low-moderate intensity
exercise, 5 times a week. Varying the types of exercise activity
can help maintain interest, as can setting up your exercycle/stairmaster/treadmill
in front of your TV during the evening news broadcast, Wheel of Fortune,
or other favorite show.
Exercise has other benefits, as well. Primary among them
is a positive effect on mood. Studies show that individuals who engage in low to
moderate intensity aerobic activity for 35-45 minutes/ 5 times per week improve
their mood/attitude. Besides generating those endorphins (runners high), the
improved endurance that develops from training probably makes it less likely for
someone to become fatigued towards the end of the day and improves one's
tolerance for things that would otherwise "tick" us off! Endurance
activity is also excellent for improving one's lipid (cholesterol) profile.
Realistic Expectations
A modest loss of only 1-2 pounds per week at the most should be
expected on average; any more is usually a result of water loss and not
fat. This may not seem like a lot, but remember that this can represent
8-16 pounds over a 2 month period (and even more if the program is
continued!). Be aware that it may take up to two years for your brain’s
"thermostat" to finally reset itself to a leaner weight, so don’t
give up the effort - it’s worth it.
In short, the secrets of a healthy weight loss program should not be a
mystery to anyone. As The Nike advertisement so eloquently states: "JUST
DO IT!" |
|
The F.I.T. Rx
Frequency: 5 times/week
or more
Intensity: low-moderate
Timing (duration): 30 - 45 minutes/day
|
The last word: types of dietary
fats
Fat is comprised of small units called
fatty acids. Each fatty acid molecule consists of carbon (C), hydrogen
(H+), and oxygen (O), arranged in a special pattern. When there
is a H+ at every available spot in the molecule, the fat is saturated.
When one H+ is missing, the fat is mono-unsaturated.
if more than one H+ is missing, it is considered poly-unsaturated.
[Note: the following chart lists fats from the least
healthy to the most healthy, both overall and within each category. Regarding
vegetable fats: softer is healthier than solid forms!]
Highly saturated fats
Coconut oil
Palm oil
Animal fats
Butter, shortening
Beef
Chicken
[Saturated fats are used by the
liver to make cholesterol, hence this is considered to be the most
dangerous type of fat. Both total and LDL ("Bad" cholesterol) are
raised. These should not exceed greater than 10% of your daily caloric
intake.]
Mono-unsaturated oils
Olive
Canola
Peanut
[Mono-unsaturated fats do not
appear to have any effect on cholesterol levels. The problem with these
oils is that they do not have a long shelf life. ]
Polyunsaturated oils
Safflower
Sunflower
Corn
Cottonseed
[Polynsaturated fats do not
appear to raise blood cholesterol levels, either.]
A word about
Trans fats
Trans fats were developed in order to increase the shelf
life of certain food products. These fats are the by-product of
hydrogenation - the chemical process used to change liquid unsaturated
fat to a more solid fat. As a result, these are structurally similar to
saturated fat and they can elevate both total and LDL cholesterol
levels, too. They have been linked to a greater risk of heart
disease. Stay away from these!
Trans fats may be found in stick margarine as well as
most commercially prepared cookies/cakes and snack foods.
You can learn more about trans fats at:
http://fpc.unl.edu/ProductCategories/TransFat.htm
|
|
You Could Have Guessed This Dept.
For those of you who watch what you eat, here's the
final word on nutrition and health. It's a relief to know the truth after
all those conflicting medical studies.
1. Japanese eat very little fat and suffer fewer
heart attacks than Americans.
2. Mexicans eat a lot of fat and suffer fewer heart
attacks than Americans.
3. Africans drink very little red wine and suffer
fewer heart attacks than Americans.
4. Italians drink excessive amounts of red wine and
suffer fewer heart attacks than Americans.
5. Germans drink a lot of beer and eat lots of
sausages and fats and suffer fewer heart attacks than the Americans.
CONCLUSION: Eat and drink what you like.
Speaking English is apparently what kills you! |

|